Protected Content

Enter the password to view this case study.

Contact me for access credentials

Back to Work

Executive Summary

2.5× More Deals Closed and +29% Productivity Through CRM-Native Conversation Intelligence

Company

Salesforce

Timeline

10 months

Platform

Web-Based CRM

My Role

Creative Director

The Problem

  • Sales conversations held critical deal and coaching signals
  • These insights lived outside the CRM and were inaccessible at scale

Outcome

  • 2.5x increase in deals closed
  • Up to 29% productivity gains

My Role

  • Led product design and experience strategy for a net-new AI product category
  • Brought design into product strategy alongside Product, Engineering, and Data Science
  • Owned end-to-end experience definition and decision-making

Detailed Case Study

1

Context and Challenge

Why This Problem Mattered

What was not working
  • Call recordings captured activity, not understanding
  • Managers lacked consistent, comparable coaching signals
Why existing solutions failed
  • Third-party tools operated outside the CRM
  • Insights were disconnected from accounts, opportunities, and outcomes
Strategic risk
  • Incomplete CRM data weakened Salesforce as system of record
  • Competitors gained leverage through conversation intelligence

Constraints and Complexities

Technical
  • Speaker identification and domain-specific language gaps
  • ML confidence often exceeded reliability
Organizational
  • High internal expectations for AI maturity
  • Pressure to ship features that were technically premature
Trust and risk
  • Privacy and disclosure had to be designed in
  • Adoption depended on explainability and restraint

My Role and Decision Ownership

I led two designers on this work as the design strategist. They carried the day-to-day interface with product management and engineering. My role was to put a design voice into product strategy and in front of leadership.

Owned
  • Experience vision and product framing
  • Design strategy for surfacing AI insights credibly
  • How and where ML signals appeared in core CRM workflows
Influenced
  • AI capability boundaries and roadmap prioritization
  • Trust and explainability standards across teams
Key decisions
  • Shifted focus from script enforcement to comparable coaching signals
  • Anchored insights directly to CRM records, not dashboards alone

Design Principles

Research across our stakeholders, pilot customers, and marketplace led us to a starting set of design principles.

Trust Before Automation

Surface signals and context, not opaque conclusions.

CRM-Native by Default

Anchor insights directly to accounts, opportunities, and workflows.

Patterns Over Prescriptions

Highlight trends and behaviors without enforcing scripts.

Adaptive, Not Static

Allow language models to learn organization-specific terminology over time.

Familiar, Not Foreign

Extend the design system to introduce new capabilities while preserving usability.


2

Design and Iteration

Missteps and Course Corrections

Conversations with frontline managers quickly revealed resistance to focusing on script accuracy. Managers coached reps to personalize calls to their own voice and style. What they needed instead were foundational, comparable signals such as talk-to-listen ratios, competitor mentions, and objection types that could inform coaching without dictating behavior.

Revised Focus on the Call

We restructured the experience around the individual call as the core record. AI insights were embedded directly into the call timeline, allowing managers to quickly identify key moments. Signals were prioritized by frequency and change over time, balancing proactive insight with cognitive load.

V1 at Launch

The version that shipped centered on interpretable, call-level insights that rolled up into team and organizational trends. These insights supported coaching, deal execution, and strategic decision-making across the CRM, establishing conversation intelligence as a scalable, enterprise capability.

Quick Follow: Video Calls

Voice was the fastest path to launch, so V1 shipped there first. Video followed close behind, extending the same insight model to video meetings. A recorded meeting produced the same call-level signals as a recorded call, so managers coached from one consistent view no matter how the conversation happened.


3

Impact and Reflection

2.5x

Deals Closed

Increase in deals closed by sales teams

+29%

Productivity

Teams reported increase in productivity up to 29%

Key Learnings

My Senior Designer Takeaway

Trust, context, and restraint drove adoption more than AI novelty.

Adoption Reality

  • Requested AI features did not guarantee usage
  • Continuous iteration was required for impact

Language Matters

  • Each organization had a unique sales lexicon
  • Models had to adapt to be accurate and actionable